Views on disabilities have changed greatly over time in Minnesota. Please note that the library has resources pertaining to many of these viewpoints and time periods.
Models of Disability and Historical Movements - These models are a few of the ways in which society and culture has categorized disabled persons and society's response to them through time. There are many models, or frameworks through which disability has been defined and regarded, but some common ones encountered in the library's collections are noted here.
- Moral or Religious Model of Disability - prevalent throughout different periods of history, this model assumes that disability is evidence of a moral failing on the part of an individual or family and may be the punishment of a higher power. Epilepsy, in particular, was seen and described as an issue of moral failure, not a neurological condition. Suggested solutions have included prayer, proper deportment and conformity to particular beliefs or behavioral models. This is one model used to push for the building and maintaining of separate institutions for those with mental and physical disabilities or the mentally ill. Families may have shown shame or fear of identification with the disabled or mentally ill member, leading to further isolation or long periods of institutionalization. The most prevalent example of this concept is seen in religious writings and opinion pieces published in the newspapers. See the State Institution Records tab in this guide for suggested collections.
- Charity Model of Disability - prevalent throughout the 1800s and 1900s, this model states that those who are disabled and unable to visibly contribute to society are "victims" who should be cared for and pitied. The emphasis is placed on "cures" to make the disabled as "normal" as possible. Language common to this model includes the terminology that someone "suffers from" or is "inflicted with" a disability instead of regarding the disability as a normal variation of human life. This is one model used to push for the building of institutions for the care of the mentally and/or physically disabled and mentally ill. For examples of this model, see the State Institution Records Tab and the Legal Reform Tab, especially resources under the 1948 Youngdahl State Hospital Reforms.
- Medical Model of Disability - this model categorizes persons with disabilities by the medical issues or abnormalities that they have, instead of focusing on the person and their self-identity, and emphasizes the "fixing, treatment, or cure" of the disability. It places the burden of adaptation and inclusion on the person with the disability, and often ignores societal influences on disability. It is most prevalent in the records of a medical nature and state institutions, especially the state hospitals. See the library's State Hospital Historical Patient Records Research Guide for early patient medical records from the state hospitals for examples written in this model.
- Social Model of Disability - popularized by some in the disabled community in about 1975, this view states that the larger majority society has labelled or identified individuals as "abnormal", even when the person does not view themselves this way. Therefore, it is the larger society that has imposed these labels and created systems and spaces fitting only those deemed "normal". This model states that society has the responsibility to alter this attitude to include all persons of all types through thoughtful accessibility, accommodations, and anti-discriminatory actions. It is also called the "Minority Group Model". See the Advocacy and Organizations and Legal Reform Tabs for collections containing this model.
- Eugenics Movement - Eugenics, a pseudoscientific theory since debunked, started in the late 1800s in England, and soon spread to other countries, using a misapplication of the theories of Charles Darwin to support the idea of human improvement through selective breeding toward a "perfect human being". The theory was first popularized by Francis Galton, a cousin of Charles Darwin, who coined the term "eugenics". Better-breeding was encouraged in a number of ways, including sterilization laws passed by 32 US states between 1907 and 1932. Minnesota passed a forced sterilization law in 1925. These laws required that various groups of people, especially those judged to be "idiots, imbeciles, epileptics, the feebleminded, and insane," be forcibly sterilized in order to stop them from having children. Women were predominately targeted by these laws, but men could be too. Charles Dight led the eugenics movements in Minnesota. In 1975, Minnesota repealed its sterilization law, and a formal apology was issued by the state in 2010. See the library's Eugenics in Minnesota Research Guide for more on this topic.
- Disability Rights Movement - Activism has a long history in the disabled community dating back to the 1800s. The groups found heightened popularity, visibility, and success as many more were formed in the 1900s and 2000s, however. While exact goals vary widely by group, the central idea of the Disability Rights Movement has been equality - of treatment, access, and opportunity - and the recognition of disability as one aspect of a whole individual that may influence, but not necessarily solely define that person. The push for legal and legislative reform, including the Americans with Disabilities Act, have been very visible aspects of this movement. Examples of advocacy as part of this movement may be seen in some of the collections highlighted on the Advocacy and Organizations tabs, as well as the Universal Design and Legal Subjects and Reform tabs.
- Sick Role of Disability - societal expectations of the ill first identified by American sociologist Talcott Parsons in 1951. The Sick Role of Disability states that American society often displays certain attitude and behavioral expectations for those who are ill - whether or not the illness is chronic, treatable, or part of a disability. Those who are ill are expected to seek a cure or aid and be compliant with the instructions of caregivers and health professionals. In turn, they are excused from certain normal societal obligations, such as attendance at school or work. These steps are expected to fix the problem and allow the ill person to resume what society has defined as "normal" activities. Those who do not conform to this expectation, whether by choice or circumstance, may be ostracized, criticized, or face societal sanction of some fashion. This concept may be encountered throughout the collections, being especially present some of the views of early state hospitals and their custodial role for patients.
Sources: For the definitions of the models of disability, the following websites were used:
Conceptualizing disability: Three models of disability. American Psychological Association. Accessed at: https://www.apa.org/ed/precollege/psychology-teacher-network/introductory-psychology/disability-models
7 Models of Disability and Why They Matter, by Adam Safar. Clym. Accessed at: https://www.clym.io/blog/7-models-of-disability-and-why-they-matter
For background on key movements, the following websites were used:
Disability History: The Disability Rights Movement. National Park Service. Accessed at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/disabilityhistoryrightsmovement.htm
A Brief History of the Disability Rights Movement. Anti-defamation League. Accessed at: https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/brief-history-disability-rights-movement